Matteson v. Bank of Am. N.A. (In re Matteson)
Aug
10
2015
Ruling
Bankruptcy court correctly held that liens were not discharged but erred in holding that debt could be reduced by amount creditor would have collected had it filed proofs of claim.
Issue(s)
Did bankruptcy court err in holding that claim of secured creditor that did not file a proof of claim was discharged and that the value of its lien was reduced by reduced by the amount that they precluded themselves from receiving through the debtor's plan?
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Matteson v. Bank of Am. N.A. (In re Matteson) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available