Skip to main content

Bostick, In re--Brookhouser v. Bostick

Bostick, In re--Brookhouser v. Bostick

Ruling
Total damages based on defendant falsely holding himself out as a residential designer weretraceable to defendant's fraudulent conduct and were nondischargeable. (Bankr. D.N.M.)
Issue(s)
Exceptions to Discharge; Types of Debt Excepted; Fraud; False Pretenses, False

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Bostick, In re--Brookhouser v. Bostick Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 11, 2024 , LexisNexis #0824-034