Skip to main content

In re Corbin

In re Corbin

Ruling
Reaffirmation agreement could not be approved as debt was secured by luxury items that could be replaced with less expensive items.
Procedural posture

The chapter 7 debtors sought to reaffirm a debt to a creditor that was secured by a cellular telephone (cell phone), a tablet, and a computer printer pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 524(c).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Corbin Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 16, 2012 , LexisNexis #0812-052