- 28 U.S.C.
Kinder MorgenPinney Dock & Transp. LLC v. Mittal Steel USA Inc. (In re Weirton Steel Corp.)
Jul
06
2007
Ruling
Bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction over cure payments under agreement from which debtor was released upon sale of the agreement and other assets.
Procedural posture
Plaintiff filed an adversary complaint against defendants, the entities that purchased substantially all the assets of a chapter 11 debtor and the successor to the entities, alleging that defendants failed to pay the remaining cure amount of an agreement that was allegedly assumed and assigned to one of the entities as part of its purchase of the debtor's assets. The successor filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Kinder MorgenPinney Dock & Transp. LLC v. Mittal Steel USA Inc. (In re Weirton Steel Corp.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
: