Mack Indus., In re--Peterson v. Premier Elec. Servs.

Ruling: 
Payments by debtor to defendant for electrical work it performed were not constructivelyfraudulent regardless of who owned the properties. (Bankr. N.D. Ill.)
Issue: 
Fraudulent Transfers and Obligations; Elements of Fraudulent Transfers; Avoidable
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Mack Indus., In re--Peterson v. Premier Elec. Servs.. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on May 19,2021, LexisNexis #0721-041