Skip to main content

Herrig, In re

Herrig, In re

Ruling
Creditor was not entitled to file a late proof of claim as it did not contend that any of the conditions for enlarging time under Rule 3002(c) applied. (Bankr. N.D. Ohio)
Issue(s)
Filing Proof of Claim or Interest.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Herrig, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 23, 2017 , LexisNexis #0717-117