SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Catherine Lam (In re Catherine Lam)
Mar
27
2008
Ruling
Conversion judgment was dischargeable absent evidence of willful and malicious injury.
Procedural posture
Plaintiff creditor, the former employer of the debtor, filed an adversary proceeding seeking to have its claim against the debtor declared nondischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(4) as based in embezzlement, and 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(6) as based in malicious behavior. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Catherine Lam (In re Catherine Lam) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
: