Freeman, In re

Debtor could not claim a homestead exemption on property located in California as theclaimed property did not meet the definition of a homestead under Mississippi law when heabandoned the property years ago and did not intend to return. (Bankr. N.D. Miss.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Freeman, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on April 23,2021, LexisNexis #0621-010