Juntoff, In re

Ruling: 
The shared responsibility payment for not having health insurance under the Affordable CareAct was not entitled to priority as it was neither a tax on or measured by income or grossreceipts nor an excise tax on a transaction. (Bankr. N.D. Ohio)
Issue: 
Priorities; Order of Priorities; Unsecured Governmental Claims.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Juntoff, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on April 15,2021, LexisNexis #0621-009