Skip to main content

Bridges v. Continentalafa Dispensing Co. (In re Continentalafa Dispensing Co.)

Bridges v. Continentalafa Dispensing Co. (In re Continentalafa Dispensing Co.)

Ruling
Prepetition WARN Act claim was not entitled to administrative expense status.
Procedural posture

Former employee filed a class action adversary proceeding against debtors, his former employers, on behalf of himself and a class of similarly situated former employees of the debtors seeking damages under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN Act) for termination of employment without 60-days advance written notice. The debtors moved to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Bridges v. Continentalafa Dispensing Co. (In re Continentalafa Dispensing Co.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on March 27, 2009 , LexisNexis #0609-044