Skip to main content

Hudson v. PrimeSouth Bank (In re Hudson)

Hudson v. PrimeSouth Bank (In re Hudson)

Ruling
Creditor did not violate stay by not withdrawing claim after payment by guarantor as payments were applied to a debt of the guarantor.
Issue(s)
Did creditor violate the automatic stay by not withdrawing its proof of claim after receiving payment from guarantor?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hudson v. PrimeSouth Bank (In re Hudson) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 09, 2015 , LexisNexis #0515-006