Skip to main content

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Rollings (In re Rollings)

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Rollings (In re Rollings)

Ruling
Credit card cash advance used to pay taxes where debtor later received refund was dischargeable.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff creditor filed a Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 motion for summary judgment in an adversary proceeding, which sought a determination that defendant debtor's payment of federal income taxes from a cash advance and the cash advance debt were nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(14).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Chase Manhattan Bank v. Rollings (In re Rollings) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 12, 2009 , LexisNexis #0409-119