- 11 U.S.C.
In re Jass
Mar
22
2006
Ruling
Court held that the debtors failed to provide sufficient evidence to rebut a presumption that "disposable income" was the same as "projected disposable income" for purposes of confirming a chapter 13 plan.
Procedural posture
The debtors moved for confirmation of their proposed chapter 13 plan and the chapter 13 trustee objected. The issue was whether the term "disposable income" was the same as "projected disposable income" as used in 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b)(1)(B). The debtors contended that their "projected disposable income" would be less than their "disposable income" due to the husband debtor's health problems.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Jass Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
: