Chung-Hwan Kim, In re--Dunlop v. Chung-Hwan Kim

Plaintiff's state court judgment against debtor deemed nondischargeable as debtor mademisrepresentations which induced them to enter into a contract and obtained progresspayments by misrepresenting his progress under the contract. (Bankr. D.N.J.)
Exceptions to Discharge; Types of Debt Excepted; Fraud; False Pretenses, False Representations or Actual Fraud.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Chung-Hwan Kim, In re--Dunlop v. Chung-Hwan Kim. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on January 31,2018, LexisNexis #0318-043