Skip to main content

Conway v. Heyl (In re Heyl)

Conway v. Heyl (In re Heyl)

Ruling
Debt was nondischargeable due to misrepresentations regarding investment in real estate development on which creditor justifiably relied.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff creditors filed a complaint against chapter 7 debtors seeking a determination that a debt was excepted from discharge under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(2)(A).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Conway v. Heyl (In re Heyl) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 13, 2012 , LexisNexis #0312-010