- 11 U.S.C.
Mullen v. Kalil (In re Mullen)
Feb
01
2006
Ruling
Debtor's action to avoid transfers to the debtor's former husband was time barred since the action was already disclosed in the debtor's discharged chapter 7 case and could not be revived by reopening the case and converting to chapter 11.
Procedural posture
Plaintiff debtor sued defendant former husband alleging that the transfers of a lease and a business were avoidable as fraudulent transfers under 11 U.S.C. § 548, the transfers of the lease and the business were avoidable under 11 U.S.C. § 544(b), the transfers of the lease and the business were avoidable preferences under 11 U.S.C. § 547(b). The former husband filed a motion for summary judgment.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Mullen v. Kalil (In re Mullen) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
: