Skip to main content

Ransom v. MBNA Am. Bank (In re Ransom)

Ransom v. MBNA Am. Bank (In re Ransom)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court properly held that above-median debtor could not claim vehicle ownership expense for vehicle owned free and clear.
Procedural posture

A debtor filed a petition under chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code and a plan for repaying his creditors. A bank filed an objection to confirmation of the debtor's plan, claiming that the debtor was not devoting all his projected disposable income to fund the plan, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b)(1)(B). The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada denied confirmation, and the debtor appealed.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Ransom v. MBNA Am. Bank (In re Ransom) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 27, 2007 , LexisNexis #0208-082