McDavid, In re--McDavid v. McDavid

Ruling: 
Complaint did not state a plausible claim for violation of the automatic stay as the property atissue was not property of the estate and it failed to plead all necessary elements. (Bankr. W.D.La.)
Issue: 
Protection Against Discriminatory Treatment; Discrimination by Private Employer.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of McDavid, In re--McDavid v. McDavid. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on November 29,2022, LexisNexis #0123-090