Frye, In re--Wallace v. Frye

Ruling: 
Dog bite claim was nondischargeable due to debtor’s knowledge of propensity for harm.(Bankr. N.D. W. Va.)
Issue: 
Discharge; Grounds for Denial; Fraud; False Oath or Account by Debtor.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Frye, In re--Wallace v. Frye. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on December 08,2020, LexisNexis #0121-091