Kern, In re

Ruling: 
Court ruled that merely owning a piece of property in another state and moving somepersonal items into it, with the intent to relocate there at some point in the future, did notsatisfy the prong that the debtors have a "physical presence" in the state. (Bankr. W.D. Va.)
Issue: 
Exemptions; Choice Between Federal and State Law; Alternative Exemptions.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Kern, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on November 29,2017, LexisNexis #0118-011